Got an incompetent lawyer? Sucks to be you
Amidst all the other turmoil of the last couple weeks, the Supreme Court delivered another blow to Americans’ rights. On May 23, the six-member conservative super-majority ruled in Shinn v. Ramirez and Jones that, in essence, defendants cannot introduce evidence in a federal habeas court (challenging a conviction or imprisonment) that was not already introduced into the state courts’ records, including when the evidence is that the defendants’ post-conviction counsel (lawyer at time of sentencing or appeal) was incompetent. Shinn v. Ramirez was the case against two Arizona ...